New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44%

I guess un-like one diarist said yesterday Zogby didn't lose his mind. Quite the contrary, it does seem like both Zogby and the Field Poll were/are onto something interesting here because according to Rasmussen, Obama has clearly caught up to Hillary in California:

According to Drudge (I know drudge isn't the most popular person around here but facts are facts):

   RASMUSSEN POLL:

   CA: Obama 45% Clinton 44%
    McCain 38% Romney 38%

Looks like Obama's 5,000+ precinct captains are kicking ass in leading an unprecedented GOTV effort in Cali....

Spin away folks.....



Display:


Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

If Obama wins California, Hillary will have to make some major adjustments.  I still count him as an underdog in California. California is supposed to be Clinton country, so if Obama upsets her? Wow?!


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:35:27 AM EST

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (2.00 / 1)

Lies!  All lies!  This poll is a fluke!  The other polls are all flukes!!


by Drummond on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:38:10 AM EST

LOL!!!!! (none / 0)


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:40:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

stay in denial. That's three polls that show good movement in favor of Obama in CA, not surprisingly you called these polls flukes.


"Apparently they have an 11-month calendar over there that's missing the month of February," Obama strategist David Axelrod
by Jr1886 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:55:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I believe (none / 0)

that you are taking seriously what was actually pretty good snark.


by fladem on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 01:36:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

i can 100% tell you I don't believe it (none / 0)

this is coming from a person who did believe the gallup and rasmussen poll 2 days ago showing it a 3 point race.

When rasmussen had california at 5 and everyone else was at 9+ and most in double digits, I didn't believe rasmussen.

Use common sense folks.

If YESTERDAY Rasmussen had a national number of
clinton 45
Obama 37
which meant yesterday for 1 day, clinton had to lead by around 10, and she's been leading in his poll everyday.

HOW COULD SHE BE LOSING IN CALIFORNIA?

She isn't.

Right now, I'd risk whatever money I have she is up double digits in California.

Not saying it couldn't change.

But I believe mason-dixon:
clinton 45
Obama 36

and then add a debate bounce.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:40:15 AM EST

Re: i can 100% tell you I don't believe it (2.00 / 2)

You also predicted SC for Hillary.


by Progressive America on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:42:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

you lost credibility after South Carolina! (none / 0)


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:51:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

maybe (none / 0)

but that's when Hillary won the election.

This campaign is over.  Right now we're in the msm attempt to spin a good election night.

Clinton - Obama 2008 is a done deal.  It's just a matter of time.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:52:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: (none / 0)

I'm not spinning anything- we'll see the real thing in two days.  


by reasonwarrior on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:46:29 AM EST

I just saw mtp talk 1/2 hour and not one (none / 0)

negative comment against Senator Clinton's opponent.

I'm  upset that Carville agreed with the template of the show.

Though I'm sure he's conflicted.
-----

If the polls show good news for Obama, I'll admit it. But the field poll was not credible. and I'll have to see more facts from rasmussen but if these Cali numbers are true, then his national poll is off, and has been for months.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:49:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

true enough (none / 0)

I own up to everything.

I can explain it. Even though its' old news.

The facts show the Clintons let SC go.
They didn't tell me.

They allowed "for the good of the party" Obama's wave to rise.

They pulled the 1 radio ad they had.  They listened to Clyburn and the rest.
Also, I didn't hear anything about their GOTV in the last day.

So I didn't get the memo that we were surrendering until on election day.

---

Please answer using facts:
IF you believe Rasmussen California, which is not out yet btw.

Then you must believe rasmussen national.
which had hillary up +8 over 4 days. The trends show she had to be +10 yesterday.
No way to square those two.

Gallup gives credence to Rasmussen national, so I disbelieve California.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:46:32 AM EST

Except that the (none / 0)

new Gallup shows it Clinton 46, Obama 44 and the new ABC shows it Clinton 47, Obama 43.

ABC has had the best track record in a cycle littered by bad polling.  

There is no way to square FOX and Rassmussen's latest with the California Rassmussen number, ABC's national number and Gallup's national number, the Zogby polling and the polling from Arizona and Missouri.

What we are seeing is enourmous volatility.  


by fladem on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 01:19:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

Let's take a step back.

I believe HRC will win California -- as a Kos poster wrote, Obama would have to win CA by 5 points in order to offset HRC's advantage in early voting.

That said, so?

Here's my thing:  she has to score a TKO on 2/5.  The $ favors Obama, the terrain from 2/5-3/4 favors Obama.

If he keeps the delegate margin to under 100, I think he wins the nomination.  He can make up a significant portion before 3/4 and then in becomes TX, OH where he gains ground over time and has more cash on hand.

HRC's $ #s.  Let's presume she raised $10M in January (I think I heard that on MTP).  She started January with a $18M cash on hand.  Well, the 2/5 burn rate means that she's probably spent $15-20M in January.

I don't know if this has been asked enough.  How much money does she have to compete in the March states?


by ChrisR on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:47:53 AM EST

The polls take into account all of the early (none / 0)

voting. 2 million early votes have been cast. And from sources of mine, Hillary won that vote 32% - 27%

Any way point is all early votes are factored into the polling models.


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:53:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The polls take into account all of the early (none / 0)

32-27%  What happened to the other 41% (not doubting you, I just hadn't heard that).  And thank you for that -- I didn't know that.

But here's my point:  let's say Hillary wins by less than 5.  So?  Let's say she has a 50-75 delegate edge coming out of Feb.  Again, so?

She raised $10M in Jan according to MTP.  Its fair to assume that the 2/5 leadup she spent $15M-20M in January.  She opened up the month with $18M.

That gives her anywhere between $8-13M for March with a negative cash flow.  All of a sudden, Obama can compete in EVERY state while Hillary is forced to choose where to compete.


by ChrisR on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:01:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The polls take into account all of the early (none / 0)

Exactly. You raise a good point. Obama is now raising money at a clip that is unheard of. He raised $32 million in 29 days in Jan. He raised another $3 million the last 2 days. $35 million in one month! and guess what? 85% of that money came from less than 100 dollar increments - online!!

So he can go back again and again!! Obama could raise $100 million dollars by the end of March. He is leading in all the Feb12th states (MD/DC/Virgina) so he really could catch fire if he is able to tie Hillary or stay close - in delegate count - on Feb 5th.

I'll try and find the link to the poll ala the 32-27% early voting spread. it was done by a Cali newspaper


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:11:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The polls take into account all of the early (none / 0)

I'd appreciate the link.

Hey, I don't know who's going to win on Feb 5th.  But if he keeps the margin relatively low, he has advantages in:

terrain before 3/4, and therefore momentum going into 3/4

and money in two big states.


by ChrisR on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:16:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

She has plenty of time (none / 0)

to raise it before the March states.

Money will not be dispostive the rest of the way.

It MAY matter, though, on Super Tuesday where I believe Obama is outspending Clinton.  


by fladem on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 01:38:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

money is a moot question (none / 0)

there is NO WAY either one of them is winning/losing based on money.

It's like a nuclear arms race, once you get to the tipping point, the rest of the bombs don't matter.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:50:29 AM EST

Re: money is a moot question (none / 0)

Oh, please.  Are you telling me that if HRC has less than $10M going out of Super Tuesday and a negative cash flow, she isn't forced to pick and choose what states she competes in after 2/5?

Again:  HRC raised $10M in January.  She almost certainly spent 50-100% more than that.  She opened with a $17M cash flow going into January.  Leaving her with anywhere from $7-12M cash on hand going into February.

She's going to have to choose where to compete, where Obama can't.

She needs a TKO Tuesday.


by ChrisR on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:06:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: money is a moot question (none / 0)

I'm in Maryland - A Feb 12th State - and I swear there is an Obama Ad playing on TV every 10 minutes. No joke. I have seen 3 different ads.


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:55:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

This Morning on Meet the Press James Carville said the Field poll that showed Clinton with only a 2 point lead was not credible. You dont see wild swings from day to day with only 2 days left before the election.


by Safe at Home on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:53:45 AM EST

see my diary (none / 0)

the field poll is a campaign contribution to obama:

it was taken: jan 25th 5 days before Edwards dropped out and in the sc/kennedy bounce  through Jan. 1.

It is not relevant except to say obama had momemtum  a week ago.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:55:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

this election is unlike any other. when will you guys learn that. Look at what happened in New Hampshire when 14 polls had Obama winning by double digits up until the last day, but then what happened?

Same in SC, Obama was supposed to win by 10 - 15 points at the most, but 28?!

so I will advise you not to base any of your punditry on historical patterns. Word on the ground in Cali is that Obama is rising seriously. Whether he has enough time to catch her? thats another story entirely......


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:56:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

Where is this new CA poll?

The MSNBC poll has Clinton up by 9%.


by kristoph on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:56:51 AM EST

wait on it. its coming out later on today. (none / 0)

Drudge got the early scoop...


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:59:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

winning missouri losing california? (none / 0)

hillary is winning +9 in Missouri

but losing California by a point?

You have to figure out something to believe, but not both.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:58:26 AM EST

You are cherry picking polling (none / 0)

other numbers show missouri dead even.


by fladem on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 01:21:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You are cherry picking polling (none / 0)

i'm talking only rasmussen, so that i would be comparing apples to apples.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 01:33:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CA & polls (none / 0)

you're forgetting independents and "undeclared voters", they are breaking 5 to 2 for Obama, and most polls say they will make 13% of the vote in Cali.

Also Hillary only leads by low single digits amongst women and is now losing men.

anyway, point is, anything could happen....


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:58:31 AM EST

Re: CA & polls (none / 0)

I wondered about that too (why is Obama not campaigning more in the state); all I can say is, I think they know what they are doing. The Obama campaign is chasing delegates not states. It is entirely plausible that Hllary wins the Popular vote in Cali (and the country at large) but Obama wins more delegates.

Don't forget that while they have both split the first 4 contests, 2 to 2, Obama has not yet lost the delegate count in any state. He won - in terms of delegates - Iowa, tied NH, won Nevada and won SC.

plus Oprah, Caroline and Michelle will light LA up this evening. They are going after the female vote.

John Kerry did San Jose and Frisco yesterday, Ted Kennedy did East LA

La Opinion (largest Hispanic news paper in Cali and the country) endorsed Obama, LA Times endorsed Obama, there's so much going on....


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:03:56 PM EST

Re: CA & polls (none / 0)

I doubt Obama's going to Win CA. I don't think his campaign thinks it's going to Win CA. But it's going to be close, and for a state like CA, close is where he wants to be.

Winning CA is a longshot at this point and if he poured all his resources into it, and spent every second there and STILL LOST (which would be the likely outcome) his campaign would be dead.

Right now it looks like Obama's strategy is to wear Clinton down in states she has huge leads, and it seems to be working. Force her into a fifty state strategy when the Dems under the Clintons never did that.


by MNPundit on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 01:01:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

The new daily tracking poll is out BTW from Rasmussen.

Clinton up by 11%, another 3% bump


by kristoph on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:03:59 PM EST

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

Hillary polls better on the weekends (friday to Sunday), typical Obama supporters (younger voters) tend not to be at home. This actually happened during the pre-christmas and post-christmas Iowa votes.  Lets see what happens with the polls on Monday or Tuesday morning. I don't like tracking polls for this reason.


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:18:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Rasmussen CA poll: Obama 45% Clinton 44% (none / 0)

I see CNN is replaying the Thursday Dem debate tonight.  Up against the Super Bowl I know, but it is still good free media for Hillary.

Speaking of which, I agree that money is not a consideration for either Obama or Clinton at this point.


by ocli on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:17:28 PM EST

2 straight 50+% for rasmussen (none / 0)

hillary had to win the debate.

she must be gaining edwards supporters.

THEREFORE

you shouldn't trust any pre debate numbers.

For the second day, hillary had to be over 50 percent to get this ras number.


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:20:25 PM EST

also, (none / 0)

no way mccain and romney are even in california


by yellowdem1129 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:23:00 PM EST

Re: also, (none / 0)

u never know. Cali is funny this year man


by rapcetera on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 12:38:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.